Featured

Ghailani sentence shows federal courts work, reveals extent of Republican hysteria Featured

Written by Andy Worthington Tuesday, 25 January 2011
Rate this item
(1 vote)
Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani. Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani.

Andy Worthington on Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani's life sentence, and why it should lead to further Guantanamo trials in federal court.

 

For those of us seeking a grown-up debate about Guantánamo in the two years since President Obama came into office, the most troubling development has been the retrenchment of Republican opposition to the closure of the prison, backed up by alarming support for the pro-Guantánamo position by members of the President's own party.
 
Like a dark magic spell capable of banishing all sensible discourse in an instant, the merest mention of the words "Guantánamo" and "terrorism" in the same sentence is sufficient to send lawmakers into paroxyms of hysteria, and nowhere is this more true than when it comes to proposals to put any of the Guantánamo prisoners on trial for their alleged offenses.
 
Guantánamo's supporters are so wedded to the Bush administration's false and damaging nation that, in the "War on Terror," terrorists are no longer criminals but are "warriors," that when Attorney General Eric Holder announced in November 2009 that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other men accused of involvement in the 9/11 attacks would face a federal court trial in New York, they raised a cacophonous roar of opposition, bleating that estabishing security at the courthouse would be prohibitively expensive, and warning that the trial would lead to a terrorist attack by al-Qaeda.
 
Last month, emboldened by their success in persuading Obama to shelve the plans for the 9/11 trial, lawmakers followed up by including a provision in a military spending bill prohibiting the transfer of any Guantánamo prisoner to the US mainland for any reason (and explicitly mentioning Khalid Sheikh Mohammed by name), even though it was clearly unconstitutional to do so.
 
Conveniently ignored by the fearmongers was the rather more mundane reality that, when Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, a former CIA "ghost prisoner," and the only Guantánamo detainee to be moved to the US to face a federal court trial before Congress decided to impose unconstitutional demands on the President, was put on trial in New York in October, there was no need for wildly expensive security, and no notion that terrorists would swoop from the skies to attack the courtroom.
 
Instead, the apologists for Guantánamo immediately changed their approach, blasting Judge Lewis Kaplan for obeying US law and refusing to accept information derived through the use of torture -- the name of an allegedly important witness who later testified under dubious circumstances, and whose name was only divulged by Ghailani while he was being tortured in a secret CIA prison.
 
Whie this was despicable enough, as it indicated that, so long as the words "Guantánamo" and "terrorism" were uttered together, it ought to be acceptable for a District Court judge to ignore the US anti-torture statute, the critics of federal court trials then proceeded to decry the trial's conclusion -- a guilty verdict on one count of conspiracy in connection with the US embassy bombing in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, in August 1998, along with the dismissal of 284 other charges -- even though, as we have seen today in the sentence handed down by Judge Kaplan, that single conviction has led to a life sentence without parole.
 
What is particularly depressing about this topsy-turvy "Alice in Wonderland" world, in which success is portrayed as failure, and no one even blinks in dissent, is that the manufactured hysteria when "Guantánamo" and "terrorism" are mentioned together not only disguises the fact that federal courts have a proven track record of successfully prosecuting terrorism cases (and are, in fact, empowered to deliver punitive sentences on the flimsiest of bases), but also disguises a fundamentally bleak truth about Guantánamo.
 
The bleak truth is that, in a prison with such a notorious and demonstrable history of torture -- particularly in connection with Ghailani, KSM and 12 other "high-value detainees," as well as dozens of other men tortured in secret CIA prisons, or in proxy facilities in other countries -- the presumption ought to be that the government's assertions about these men are fundamentally unreliable, because torture is unreliable as well as illegal, and should not be taken at face value.
 
Instead, however, the opposite is true, and Ghaliani, for example, was happily judged to be guilty until proven guilty, by those who will, no doubt, still complain that he received a life senternce on just one count of conspiracy, and not on all of the 285 charges he faced.
 
With Ghailani's life sentence, it is time for this cynical nonsense to come to an end. Federal court trials for terrorists work, and opponents should now cease whining, let go of their ideologically misplaced obsession with trying "warriors" in military trials at Guantánamo, and allow the administration to proceed with the federal court trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his alleged co-conspirators. 
 
Nine years and four months after the 9/11 attacks, the relatives of the victims of that dreadful day deserve justice, and not to be made playthings by cynical lawmakers -- and their echo chambers in the right-wing media -- who will soon realize that their beloved Military Commissions are fraught with problems, and will, if given the chance, shift their focus so that, in the not too distant future, we will be hearing that some people -- like KSM and his co-accused -- are so dangerous that they cannot even be put on trial at all.
 
Andy Worthington is a Senior Researcher for Cageprisoners. He is also the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America's Illegal Prison (published by Pluto Press) and the co-director (with Polly Nash) of the new documentary, "Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo.” Visit his website here.
Login to post comments

Sign up for email updates

Code:

Get the latest news, appeals and campaign updates.

Events

All Events ...

What's New

Blog

Login